post 9

Singer I found is a very interesting man, his main ethics is he believes everyone should be treated equal, he is a strong believer in animal right. He doesn’t think it is necessary to harm anyone or thing unless it is going to be benefited from in the long run. From Singers utilitarian perspective he doesn’t believe in suffering of humans or animals he would like to see it reduced. This is why he goes by the greatest number for the greatest good.
Singer believes we should eliminate and or avoid specisism because this is allowing their species take priority of other species for example how we eat animals and they suffer to let us be fulfilled. He believer we need to stop killing animals. He also believes it is very wrong to experiment on animals that is causing them to suffer and harming animals.
In the Lane neuron- ethical argument simply state that eating meat is wrong and vegetarianism is the way to go to avoid harming animals. Singer believes that we should not be influenced by our cultures to eat meet or by others he doesn’t want us harming and killing animals and animals have a central nervous system and they can feel pain; this is not fair to the animals. After reading on Singers ethics I am totally for the animals and always have been but I just don’t think I can not eat meat I know it is hurting the animals but I was raised on it and would way to hard to stop eating meat.
.